Why Does Your Testicles Hurt When You Bend Over

Lake Garda are three major spas : are located in Sirmione, Bardolino and Lazise .

In the beautiful Sirmione (worth visiting if they spend their holidays on the lake) is a very modern facility, the Spa and Health Centre Aquaria. I would say that if the full five stars it deserves.


Aquaria: The fabulous swimming pool at night

Well done also site: termedisirmione which makes it a good idea. On the same website there is information of the other two centers in town: the Spa Catullus and Virgil to .

While Sirmione is located on the south side of Lake, Bardolino and Lazise are located in the east. A Bardolino are the Caesius Terme Spa and also the ' hotel. To find the Lazise Garda Thermal Park . ________________________


Here are the spa towns of Lake Garda, with links to official websites that contain information about the baths, on facilities, hotel deals and offers:

Spa on the south side of Lake Garda
Spa Catullo, Sirmione Spa
Virgilio, Sirmione Thermal Spa
Aquaria, Sirmione
http://www.termedisirmione.com/

Spa in the eastern part of Lake Garda
Caesius Terme Spa bardolino
http://www.termedibardolino-caesius.com/
http://www.hotelcaesiusterme.com/
Thermal Park Garda, Lazise
http://www.parcotermaledelgarda.it/

These are the spas of the lake:

Health Centres in the south of the lake
Arzaga Spa Palace Spa Hotel, Desenzano del Garda
Wellness Center Hotel Ai Capitani Peschiera del Garda Farm
Preseglie Of course, Sirmione Thermal Spa
Aquaria, Sirmione

Wellness Centers in the western part of Lake Garda Hotel Faver
Park, Tremosine
Lemon Residence - Appartements & Spa, Beauty Center Toscolano-Maderno
Tao, Salò
Beauty & Wellness Center Hotel Residence Piccola Italy, Tremosine
Ninfea Wellnesscenter Park Hotel Faver, Tremosine

Wellness Centers in the eastern part of Lake
Wellness Center Hotel Belfiore Brenzone
Wellness & Beauty Center Hotel Regina Adelaide, Garda
Boffenigo Boutique Hotel & SPA, Beauty Center Costermano
Cedar Villa, Lazise

Remote Car Starter For Older Vehicles

FIMI: SIAE stickers violate copyright

Rome - No doubt, no hesitation: the Federation of Italian music, long time critic of the whole question SIAE , has taken an official position clear. According to FIMI legislation for the affixation on media should be scrapped as soon .

FIMI has said during a hearing at the Ministry of Culture, explaining to subscribe also the position taken by both the European Court of Justice that the European Commission, that the SIAE conflict with Community law. The Federation insists on this point, emphasizing how violation of EU rules impact on transparency, but above all, the SIAE hinders the principle of free movement of goods within the EU .

The music industry detail this aspect, so important for the current business of producing industry: the EC Treaty, FIMI recalls, "prohibits the Member States to enact legislation capable of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, intra-Community trade. There is no doubt that the configuration for affixing the SIAE as a requirement violates this fundamental principle of the Single Market. "

The reference is obvious: the current system contrassagnatura forces producers who spread works covered by copyright of "altering the packaging of products and support additional labeling costs for those products for sale on the Italian market." In other words: the Italian market end products diversified than those distributed in other markets, with additional costs and timing defect is not the will of the authors or publishers but rather to satisfy the requirement of marking provided to the Company of the authors and publishers.

not alone. FIMI points out that the manufacturers of the above should also use separate distribution channels to avoid media in Italy do not end up with no markings. "Furthermore - continued FIMI - Distributors EU import CDs, DVDs or music non-Italian in a given Member State, and that at some point wish to re-export to Italy, would be discouraged from doing so because of the burden of additional costs and , that the purchase and affixing the SIAE in the packaging of CDs and DVDs behavior. "

The Federation has also reminded the Minister that the European Court of Justice has not only already rejected the SIAE in the past but has already done several times against the labeling requirements in other areas, such as on certain food products conditioned by a labeling required by Belgian law, which ended up stamps weigh on producers by altering the free market.

And there are no exceptions , FIMI ear, because "the legislation sull'apposizione mark in no way promotes public policy or the interests of consumers and is not necessary for the protection of intellectual property. On the contrary, 'obligation to affix the SIAE not expressed any need for protection. we consider that in order to obtain the SIAE is sufficient clearance by the applicant in which he claims to respect the rules on copyright. The law does not require any prior verification by the SIAE that the applicant is a holder of copyright or has been authorized by the holder of those rights. Neither the SIAE conducts no independent verification to ensure that a product on which the mark should be affixed is genuine. The mark therefore has no relation to the legality of the product. "

The reasons for the permanent removal of the heavy tax include the fact that, according to FIMI, violates the copyright, criminal law and the Italian Constitution . The reason: It is in the judgments of the Supreme Court, where it shows a striking paradox: "Art. 171bis back the penalty only to the absence of the SIAE on media containing computer programs, without any relation with the actual originality of the product. In other words, the original manufacturer that bestow legal products in terms of discharge of copyright but no mark could be held liable for breach of Article. 171bis Instead the counterfeiters who have stamped the SIAE (true or false) about illegal products will not suffer any penalty. This reverses the meaning and purpose of criminal law on copyright, making it even counterproductive. "

What Do The Ontario Red License Plates Mean

The Supreme Court: Beppe Grillo enough signatures for the referendum

ROME - The Supreme Court has imposed a halt on publishing the referendum promoted by Beppe Grillo. The judges of the Supreme Court consider that insufficient signatures collected during the "vaffa day" organized by Grillo. In Specifically, the judges of the Supreme Court of the Central Bureau for the referendum, after examining all the signatures collected in relation to any question among those proposed, are not considered formally correct procedures for the collection of hundreds of thousands of signatures. Consequently none of the three proposed referendum questions would have reached 500 thousand signatures.

formal problems - problems of a formal nature, on which the same Grillo will "tell her" at the hearing that the Supreme Court convened for 25 November. The invitation was initiated by the President of the Commission for the referendum, the magistrate Corrado Carnevale. Using the right replication expected in these cases to the promoters of the referendum, Beppe Grillo may challenge the conclusions reached by the Supreme Court, and groped to "save" at least one of the referendum. The three referenda proposed by the comedian about the abolition of the Order of Journalists, the abolition of public funding and the repeal of the Gasparri law on publishing frequency tv.

Black And White Checkered Hoodie

The Chamber sends out the anti-blog DDL

Rome - It was October 2007. The Council of Ministers approved the so-called " DDL Levi-Prodi " bill that included an obligation for all blogs to register with the Register of Communications Operators and the consequent increase in their heads press offenses.

The news, the discovery of the jurist Valentino Spataro and relaunched by Point Computer , sparked an uproar . They apologized and dissociated ministers and Gentiloni Di Pietro, he laughed Times, published a Beppe Grillo comment of fire on his blog. The project suffered a hard landing and after a while 'the dust settled. Prodi's government fell.

A year later, in November 2008. Another lawyer, Daniele Minotti, he realizes that the bill turns back in the classrooms of our Parliament , given in the referral to the House Committee on Culture (DDL C. 1269).

Minotti makes a brief analysis on your blog, marking the differences between the new and the previous text. We have some differences of interpretation. Let us together look at the highlights of the draft law to understand what they can expect surfers and bloggers Italian:

Article 2.
(Definition of editorial product) .

1. For the purposes of this Act, for publishing product means any product covered by the objectives of information, training, dissemination or publication is intended for entertainment and, whatever the form in which it is achieved and the means by which it is widespread.

Any blog that classification.

Article 8.
(Publishing on the Internet.)

1. Registration in the Register of communications operators of entities engaged in publishing activities on the internet network also notes the implementation of the standards for liability related to the violation of press .

3. Are excluded from entry in the Register of Communications Operators those who access the Internet network or operating on the same forms or products, such as carpooling or personal sites, which are not the result of a ' organization entrepreneurial work. Apparently

paragraph 3 excludes the majority of blogs from the registration and related legal risks. But it is not so . Here are some examples.

The blog of Beppe Grillo has an editorial staff, has banner ads, sell products. Put simply, according to both the Civil Code , both according to the common interpretation of the Revenue, is business activities. If the bill were approved, therefore, Beppe Grillo would most likely required to register with the ROC. Not only that: it would thus be subject to various penalties provided for press offenses.

Affairs his own, perhaps some will say. Yet it is not the only one to worry about. In the same situation would find dozens, probably hundreds of other unsuspecting bloggers . For whosoever shall submit with their banner advertising, promotions, or listings of Google AdSense, according to the common interpretation Revenue Agency, ago business activities.

The reasoning is simple. The placing of banner advertising is an ongoing generating revenues, the provision is an ongoing enterprise, who does business through its own publications must register with the ROC, who is registered the ROC may incur in press offenses. Those who are in this situation and is not registered with the ROC, can be sued for printing illegal ( remember a recent case ).

As in our knowledge, there is still no official pronouncement closely Revenue Agency ( questioning) whether the use of some of the activities contained in the banner (but the direction is clear enough: banner = lucrative activities continuous, ongoing activity lucrative = business).

For this reason, if the draft law was approved as now proposed, we would be at best face a law punishable by multiple interpretations and therefore potentially very dangerous. Here's an example of fantasy, set in Duckburg.

Rockerduck: "If you do not delete the article on your blog that speaks ill of me, I drag you to court for libel."
Donald: "But my blog is not a newspaper!"
Rockerduck: "But you have a banner ad, then you may be undertaking, and then you have to register with the ROC. Indeed, if not remove the article will also sue for underground press."
Donald: "Ok. Sob."

Try replacing "Rockerduck" with "kid" and "Donald Duck" with "citizen" and you're done.

Luca Spinelli